"Brotherhood's Mursi sworn in as Egyptian president"

Mohammed Mursi has been sworn in as Egypt's first civilian, democratically elected president at a historic ceremony in Cairo. Hours after the ceremony, he was saluted by Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, leader of the military council which is handing over power..

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Afghan policeman kills three British soldiers

              Three British soldiers have been killed by a policeman in southern Afghanistan, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has said

       Two served with the 1st Battalion Welsh Guards and one with the Royal Corps of Signals. Next of kin have been told.

        The MoD said the soldiers were shot and fatally wounded on Sunday as they left a checkpoint in
       Helmand province. The gunman was injured and later detained.

         More than 20 foreign personnel have been killed in rogue shootings in Afghanistan this year.
Such shootings are sometimes referred to as "green on blue" attacks because of the colours representing Afghan (green) and Nato (blue) forces.

        The soldiers were part of a Nato-led Isaf force who have been training Afghan counterparts ahead of a handover of security responsibility by 2014.

        The shooting happened at Checkpoint Kamparack Pul in Nahr-e-Saraj, where the soldiers were attending a meeting of elders.

        They were shot as they were leaving the checkpoint.

         Sources told the BBC a fourth British soldier was injured in the shooting but was not seriously hurt.
Prime Minister David Cameron said he was "deeply saddened by the appalling news".

           "This tragic incident again demonstrates the very real risks that our brave soldiers face every day. We will do everything possible to find out how this happened, and learn any lessons for the future," he said in a statement.

            Leader of the Opposition, Ed Miliband, told the Commons the deaths reminded them of "our duty to do everything we can to protect" UK troops.

           Defence Secretary Philip Hammond signalled that the killings would not prompt an overall change of strategy.

            He said: "Every day, tens of thousands of coalition forces, including UK personnel, live and work successfully with their Afghan counterparts to build an Afghan police force and Army which can take the lead for their own security by the end of 2014.

            "That process will continue, and though deeply tragic, yesterday's incident and attacks like it will not derail the mission or distract us from the task in hand."

            His sentiments were echoed by Nato secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen said who said the Taliban had "played out a strategy" to undermine confidence in the Afghan security forces but he stressed that the insurgents could not "derail" his organisation's strategy.

            BBC defence correspondent Caroline Wyatt said that background checks are carried out on Afghan troops and police in a bid to ensure that people are not sympathetic to insurgent factions.

            But Mark Cann, spokesman for the British Forces Foundation charity, said soldiers were worried about how Afghan colleagues, particularly police, were vetted.

        'More cautious'

         And the BBC's Quentin Sommerville said the shooting, and other "green on blue" killings, meant the trust between international troops and their Afghan counterparts was diminished.

         "It makes everybody a little more cautious," he said.

          "They [Isaf soldiers] need to know that the man standing to their left and their right is someone they can trust and with these kinds of incidents that has deteriorated."

           The deaths were announced by a spokesman for Task Force Helmand who said: "Their loss will be felt deeply across the task force. However, that will be nothing compared with the grief experienced by their families at home.

          "Our thoughts and prayers are with them at this extremely difficult time."

          The attack appears to be the latest in a string of flashpoints in which members of the Afghan security or police forces have opened fire on international allies.

            The latest deaths mean a total of 26 Isaf personnel have been killed so far this year, compared with 35 for the whole of 2011.

           A total of 14 British troops have been killed in the past three years in Green on Blue attacks.

          In February, public opinion against the foreign forces in Afghanistan was inflamed by revelations that US troops burned copies of the Koran at a base in Afghanistan - reportedly by accident.

          The shooting of 16 Afghans by a US soldier in March has also created resentment.



Libya: ICC staff held in Zintan released

Lawyer Melinda Taylor (R) and translator Helene Assaf after their release (2 July) 

          Four staff members from the International Criminal Court (ICC) held in Libya for four weeks on suspicion of spying have been released.

        The announcement came during a visit to Libya by ICC president Sang-Hyun Song.

       The team had been accused of spying while visiting Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, son of the deposed Libyan leader, in the town of Zintan.

        A senior member of the Libyan attorney-general's office confirmed to the BBC that the four would be leaving Libya.

         "They are due to face the courts here in Tripoli for the final ruling" on 23 July, the source said.

         "We expect them to come back for the hearing but if they don't, a ruling will be made in absentia," the source added.

      Coded documents

           Mr Song offered an apology to the Libyan authorities for the "difficulties" caused by the mission.
In a news conference organised in Zintan, Mr Song also thanked the Libyan authorities for arranging the "release of the four ICC staff to be re-united with their families".

         Mr Song also "expressed his relief that the ICC staff members were well treated during their detention".
         The ICC employees had been accused of jeopardising Libya's national security, the BBC's Rana Jawad in Tripoli reports.

          One of the four, Australian lawyer Melinda Taylor, was accused of passing Saif al-Islam coded documents, allegedly written by his former right-hand man, during the team's visit.

          Ms Taylor and her Lebanese colleague Helene Assaf, a translator, were then formally detained.

         Their two other colleagues, Russian Alexander Khodakov and Spaniard Esteban Peralta Losilla, remained with them out of solidarity.

          Last week, the ICC promised in a statement to investigate any claims of wrongdoing by its staff upon their release and to impose "appropriate sanctions" if necessary.

         Ms Taylor was appointed by the ICC to help prepare the defence of Saif al-Islam, who was captured by the Zintan militia last November as he tried to flee the country.

         The Zintan militia have refused to hand Saif al-Islam over to Tripoli, while the Libyan government is rejecting ICC demands to try him in The Hague.

         Some have expressed concern that Saif al-Islam may not face a fair trial in Libya.

          He was previously considered to be heir apparent to his father, Col Muammar Gaddafi, who was overthrown last year following a popular uprising and Nato air campaign mandated by the UN to protect Libyan civilians.

         Col Gaddafi himself was killed after being captured during an assault on his hometown of Sirte in October.

 

Does being big on Twitter help you land a good job?


        What's the best way to impress employers - having tons of Twitter followers, or a flashy CV? Go for big-name companies and prestige every time, advises Lucy Kellaway of the Financial Times.

           If you asked me about my working life, I would tell you that I've worked at the Financial Times for a quarter of a century. If pressed further, I might reveal (depending on who was asking) that long ago I worked briefly for JPMorgan. I might also add that I went to Oxford University.

          Yet according to a blog on the Harvard Business Review website, this sort of institutional name-dropping is not only vain and superficial, it has outlived its usefulness.

           Prestige simply isn't as prestigious as it used to be.

           For a start many of the big names aren't looking so impressive any more. We don't revere Goldman Sachs or News Corp or McKinsey in the same way we used to.
           And social networks mean we no longer have to rely on the names of institutions to do our signalling for us - we can do it ourselves.

          The upshot is that young people should stop scrambling over each other for jobs at Bain and Morgan Stanley - all such big names do is pigeonhole people. The only true way to stand out is to stop focusing on who you are working for, and think of what you are doing instead.

         This blog is one of the most cheering things I've read in ages.
   
        Or rather it would be cheering if it weren't for the fact that it is completely wrong.

         Of course it is achievements that count. The trouble is, most people, apart from a few entrepreneurs, haven't really achieved anything terribly tangible. If you are Mark Zuckerberg you don't need big names on your CV. The rest of us do.

         Far from getting less important, flashy affiliations are now more important than ever. This is partly because the job market is so bad that everyone needs all the help they can get. But it's also because getting these good jobs and good degrees is harder than it used to be.

JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, News Corp

          In my day what counted was breeding and luck, with effort and skill lagging far behind. Now the order is reversed.

         Anybody who has got a job at Goldman and held on to it for a decade has achieved something that might not be socially valuable, but offers conclusive proof that the person is bright and hardworking - as well as possibly arrogant and greedy.
          Neither do social networks make affiliations redundant. The more information there is out there, the more we need a few decent names on a CV as a shortcut.

         And I fail to see how being big on Twitter makes you attractive to future employers. Surely it just tells them you spend more time composing silly little messages than working.

        So I would advise the ambitious to go for prestige every time. Of course it is shallow and unfair, but it works.

         Having a prestigious employer already is a great help in finding a new one. And the great thing about such affiliations is that even if they don't impress others (which they do, mostly) they may impress yourself.
In my experience these mighty institutions work well as comfort blankets, wombs and crutches, all roles that are generally frowned on - but wrongly so. I'm a huge fan of all three.

 

Barclays boss Bob Diamond resigns amid Libor scandal

Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond


          Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond has resigned with immediate effect. 

        The move comes less than a week after the bank was fined a record amount for trying to manipulate inter-bank lending rates.

         Mr Diamond said he was stepping down because the external pressure on the bank risked "damaging the franchise".

          Chancellor George Osborne welcomed the decision and said he hoped it was the "first step towards a new culture of responsibility in British banking".

          "It is the right decision for the country," Mr Osborne said, saying the country needed a strong Barclays concentrating on lending and contributing to economic recovery.

          Chairman Marcus Agius, who had announced his own resignation on Monday, will now take over the running of Barclays until a replacement is found.

         "I am deeply disappointed that the impression created by the events announced last week about what Barclays and its people stand for could not be further from the truth," Mr Diamond said in a statement.

         He will still appear before MPs on the Treasury Committee on Wednesday to answer questions about the Libor affair.





         "I look forward to fulfilling my obligation to contribute to the Treasury Committee's enquiries related to the settlements that Barclays announced last week without my leadership in question," Mr Diamond said.

          The Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, told the BBC that Mr Diamond's resignation was "the right decision".

         "There are many questions to be answered about the rate fixing and Barclays will have to answer many of those questions," said Mr Alexander.

          "Responsibility has been taken in the right way. Hopefully this will help Barclays to establish the right culture in the future."

      Resignation calls

         Last week, regulators in the US and UK fined Barclays £290m ($450m) for attempting to rig Libor and Euribor, the interest rates at which banks lend to each other, which underpin trillions of pounds worth of financial transactions.






            Staff did this over a number of years, trying to raise them for profit and then, during the financial crisis, lowering them to hide the level to which Barclays was under financial stress.

           Prime Minister David Cameron, who has launched an inquiry into banking standards, has described the rigging of Libor rates as "a scandal".

          The Serious Fraud Office is also considering whether to bring criminal charges.
After Mr Agius announced his resignation on Monday, politicians and shareholders continued to call for Mr Diamond to go.

           Responding to Mr Diamond's departure, opposition leader Ed Miliband said: "It was clear Bob Diamond was not the man to lead the change that Barclays needed."

            He repeated Labour's criticism of the terms of the parliamentary inquiry, to be led by the head of the    
            Treasury Committee, that the government announced this week.

            "This is about the culture and practices of the entire banking system which is why we need an independent, open, judge-led, public inquiry."
Mr Diamond, one of the UK's highest paid chief executives, was head of Barclays Capital, its investment bank division, when his staff were trying to manipulate the key inter-bank rates.

          "He maintains that he didn't know what was going on," says BBC business editor Robert Peston. "He feels he was hounded out."

          It emerged over the weekend that Mr Diamond spoke to the deputy governor of the Bank of England Andrew Tucker about Barclays' Libor submissions at the height of the credit crunch in 2008.

         The details of that telephone conversation will be an important area of questioning at this week's hearing of the Treasury Committee.

          Barclays' managers came to believe, after the conversation between Mr Diamond and Mr Tucker, that the Bank of England had sanctioned them to lie about what they were paying to borrow when providing data to the committees that set the Libor rate.

 

La Barbe: France's bearded feminists

The Grand Orient


     A group of French feminists has found a new way to fight inequality - with sarcastic humour and fake beards. Only rarely is there a violent response.

         Colette Coffin unzipped her handbag and pulled out a small piece of artificial fur. "This is my speaking beard," she explains.

       "I've got a much bushier one but this has a wider hole so I can talk without getting too much fluff in my mouth."

       Deftly, she hooks the string loops around her ears and turns to face me. The effect is bizarre. With the little ginger triangle on her chin, the schoolteacher wearing a prim summer dress resembles a wannabe Lenin.

       Ilana Eloit, a political sciences student in jeans, shows me her beard. It matches her long dark hair perfectly but she complains it is "very itchy".
Glancing around, she stuffs it back into her bag under the table. "We don't want to give the game away yet," she says.

        As dusk falls, I sit at a pavement cafe in an upmarket neighbourhood in Paris with a dozen members of the direct action feminist group, La Barbe.

        The name comes from the group's pantomime style of protest. Its members infiltrate high-level, male-dominated meetings. In due course they get to their feet and silently don false beards before one of them reads out an ironic statement congratulating the men on their supremacy.

       The emphasis on facial hair ridicules antiquated male attitudes. "It's meant to be 'ringard'," says Ilana.
        "How would you translate that? Maybe 'corny' or 'behind the times'? You see, in the days of the Third Republic, all the great men used to wear big beards. That was the end of the 19th Century but not much has changed in the way many men behave and think in France."

       In colloquial French, La Barbe also means "enough is enough". The group includes women of all ages from teenagers to grandmothers. They come from a variety of backgrounds and say they are united by a determination to fight entrenched sexism.
        La Barbe was set up four years ago in the wake of the last presidential elections when, for the first time, one of the mainstream parties fielded a female candidate for the top job in French politics.
Ultimately the Socialist candidate Segolene Royal lost out to Nicolas Sarkozy of the centre-right. Now Royal's ex-partner, Francois Hollande, the man she lived with for 25 years, is president.
      
      Women in Hollande's government 
            Back in 2007, many women complained about male chauvinism in the press and on the campaign trail. When Royal announced her decision to stand, some of the most dismissive remarks were made by her own party colleagues. Laurent Fabius, who ran against her, publicly asked who would look after her children if she went for the presidency.

       Since then La Barbe has targeted political parties, shareholder meetings of big businesses and other institutions which they see as male-dominated.
Cannes Festival protest 
       No films by women? "Marvellous!", "Thank you!"
Recently the group made global headlines when members crashed the Cannes Film Festival. On the red carpet normally reserved for glamorous stars in designer dresses, five bearded women posed with signs which read "Marvellous!" ''Thank you!" ''Splendid!" and ''Incredible!"

        They were angry that none of the 22 films selected for the official competition was directed by a woman.
"Generally, feminist happenings are all about women," says Colette.

        "But we focus on men because the problem for us is not women, it's men.

        "Our idea is to create a mirror effect to show a male-dominated situation which highlights the invisibility of women."

        On this particular evening, the group had invited me to witness a protest at the headquarters of the French Freemasons, the Grand Orient de France, which was founded in 1733.

         I wondered why they had picked on the masons. For many years, the Grand Orient would not allow its lodges to initiate women, but this changed in 2010.

        "You see, there was a huge conflict," says Colette. "It wasn't easy at all. That proposition was adopted at something like 51% of the lodge, but it was tough and many of them are still fiercely opposed to women."

        At intervals, members of La Barbe walk into the masons temple on the Rue Cadet, ostensibly to hear a public lecture entitled "What sort of secular morality for what kind of Republic?"

        I follow them into a hall decorated with neo-classical columns and red velvet curtains. In front of a huge bust of Marianne - a symbol of the French Republic - four men are seated on a low stage.

        The presentation was characterised by impossibly long Gallic sentences and a succession of rhetorical questions. I try hard to concentrate but my mind starts to wander.

      After 15 minutes, the first bearded lady gets to her feet.

La Barbe activist in Freemason's lodge
    
       Several more follow suit but the speaker, the director of a religious affairs institute, pretends not to notice. Members of the audience began to whisper and crane their necks.

        Finally the women climb on to the stage. Colette stands at the lectern and reads out a brief statement praising the masons for their tireless work in excluding women for so many years.

       With the usual irony she asks how some heretical lodges could be permitted to accept "sisters" after a battle lasting three centuries. Guy Arcizet, the Grand Master of the Lodge, looks uncomfortable but tries to smile and insists that he is all in favour of freedom of expression.

Colette's speech (excerpt)

Colette's speech

      Out of the corner of my eye, I see a door opening at the other end of the hall and a security man appears. It is clear he is not amused and his face begins to twitch.
      Having made their point, the women are preparing a dignified departure but then a student supporter begins taking pictures. Suddenly the gloves came off.
The young man's camera is ripped from his hands and the women are jostled and pushed out of the hall by about 10 men. Some belong to the security service of the Grand Orient. Others are apparently members of the masonic lodge.
     When I asked why so much force is being used, a plainclothes security man seizes me by the shoulder and tries to drag me down the corridor. Then he snatches my mobile phone.
    Colette emerges from the fracas with broken glasses and a large purple bruise on her shoulder. Other members of the group show me cuts and scratches on their hands and arms. They too had their phones and handbags confiscated.

      "They had no right to invade our privacy," says one of the masons. Another man, sweating profusely, is trying to calm the situation but his impassioned pleas only make things worse.
By the time I get downstairs, there are four police cars in the street outside.

     "Over the past four years we have done nearly 100 actions but this is the first time we've had to press charges for assault," says a badly shaken Colette.

     I asked the French Freemasons for a comment on the incident, but they were unable to provide one.
La Barbe pride themselves on their sense of humour but there is real anger behind their antics.
The gender wars in France have been exacerbated recently by the Dominique Strauss Kahn scandal which exposed a time-honoured practice in France of hushing-up or shrugging off sexual advances by powerful men.
Then, in the dying days of the Sarkozy presidency, a decision by the constitutional council to scrap France's sexual harassment law sparked outrage. This judgment meant that all ongoing cases not yet ruled on in court would be thrown out leaving many victims with no legal protection.
The law was repealed after a complaint that it was "too vague" by a former deputy mayor in the southern Rhone region, who had been sentenced to three months in prison and a 5,000 euro (£4,020) fine for sexually harassing three employees.

     "On the plus side," says Ilana, "Hollande's new government has a record number of women, even if they control few of the most important ministries. But we suspect it is tokenism, because most of the top civil servants behind the scenes are men."

      Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, the first French women's rights minister since the 1980s, has promised a revised sexual harassment law will be presented to the new parliament within the next few weeks.
She admits that France has slipped down all international rankings on equal rights, and has vowed to promote gender equality.

 

Monday, July 2, 2012

Why make art no-one can see?


         For most artists, the creative ideal would be to have their work shown in public. Others have a more esoteric desire to not have their work seen at all. But what can this achieve?

         Paa Joe crafts magnificent sculptures out of wood. He paints them and perfects them until he is happy and then he watches them get buried in the ground.

        Unlike some artists who see burial as a way of adding value to their work, Paa Joe admits he finds it hard to watch his work disappear into the soil, never to be seen again.

          But sadly for him, it is essential. He is a coffin maker, and one of the world's finest. Rather than the plain wooden box, Paa Joe, real name Joseph Ashong, sculpts coffins into flamboyant shapes in bright colours.

        He is an artist in every sense of the word. His coffins are rooted in Ghanaian tradition. They reflect the foibles and ambitions of the deceased - an inveterate drinker may be buried in a giant beer bottle, a lothario in a coffin shaped like a reclining naked woman. He has made a Porsche coffin, a lion coffin, a pink fish coffin.   He has even made coffins in the shape of a giant cocoa bean and a trainer.

Ghanaian coffins in the shape of fish and a mobile phone

        "Sometimes when it's finished when people take it to put it in the grave, I am not happy," he says. "I used my idea to make that thing."
        Some of the most famous artistic creations in history such as the Terracotta Army surrounding the tomb of the first Emperor Qin Shihuang and the Sutton Hoo ship burial, have been entombed to honour the dead.

       And it was not intended that the Tutankhamun treasure, though exceptionally lavish and made of gold, would be seen again by humans after it was deposited in the Egyptian king's tomb.

        Keeping a work from public view can actually raise its profile. Mystery is appealing.

        British artist Jason DeCaires Taylor submerges his sculptures under nine metres of water off the coast of Mexico. Accessible only to scuba divers, the figures are made from marine grade cement and attract corals and seaweeds, overtime transforming into artificial reefs.

         "I do quite like the hidden element, I like the idea that something exists but people don't know about it," he says.

Underwater sculpture

         Taylor's latest idea is to sink a sculpture to the bottom of a 500-metre deep volcanic lake in Guatemala. No-one could see it - not even the artist. He would instead have to drop it from the surface and hope for the best.

        "It would be great if in hundreds of years' time when we have made the technological advances to make exploring the bottom of a volcanic lake possible, someone might discover it," he says.
Another piece currently in the planning is an installation dropped deep out at sea.

         "I wouldn't tell anyone the coordinates and the sea is so vast that no-one would ever find it," Taylor says.
Burial day - photo courtesy of Judith & Norman ALIX Art Gallery, Gift of the Artist 

           "It's quite a controversial piece about religion and I wouldn't want it defaced, so people not knowing where it is would work well for me. Photography then becomes very important, I'd take pictures for people to see the work."

           It is a quirk of human behaviour that the more difficult something is to see, the more some people want to see it.

           This was the theory behind Canadian artist Peter von Tiesenhausen's decision to bury a sculpture almost four metres underground, beneath a sewer at the main crossroads in the city of Sarnia, Ontario.

           The iron bust, called Mooring, was buried in 2009. In the application for permission submitted to the County of Lambton council, it was stated that the process would see the work "elevated to myth status", creating a topic of conversation and strengthening community as a consequence, the idea being that people would share the mystery of their city.

        So did he feel sad to watch it disappear?

       "I felt the opposite; I saw it as potential for hope and for future growth," says von Tiesenhausen. "It's like a seed, the myth around it will build. It becomes possibly greater than it would have been if people could see it, get up close and critique it."

 


Syria-Turkey tension: Assad 'regrets' F-4 jet's downing

Breaking news

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is quoting as saying he regrets "100 per cent" a Turkish jet was shot down after entering Syrian airspace.

       In an interview with Turkey's Cumhuriyet newspaper, he argues that the plane was flying in an area previously used by Israel's air force.

       The plane went down in the Mediterranean last month and the two pilots have not been found.
The incident has heightened tensions between the two countries.

       Last week, Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan condemned Syria's action and described the neighbouring country as a "clear and present threat".

      Turkey reinforced border areas with rocket-launchers and anti-aircraft guns.
On Sunday, Turkey said it had scrambled six F-16 fighter jets when Syrian helicopters had approached the border.

     "We will not allow (the shooting down) to turn into open combat between the two countries," President Assad is quoted as saying.

      Cumhuriyet, which published the interview on Tuesday, does not indicate when it took place but shows a picture of Mr Assad standing beside its Ankara bureau chief Utku Cakirozer.

 

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More